In yesterday’s article I mentioned some ways we can use numbers like our insulin sensitivity factor. Here’s another.
If we see our BG climbing steadily, we usually know something’s going on. It could be that the food we ate had a larger effect than we expected (such as the carb count was underestimated).
Or maybe the insulin isn’t getting in, or has “gone off” (e.g. due to heat). Especially after putting in a new cannula I tend to keep an eye on my CGM to detect if the site isn’t working.
So how can we tell the difference?
We can use the ISF and the basal-rate information to gauge how fast our BG will be rising if we’re getting no insulin (assuming no unusual food/exercise/etc is going on too). Once the previous basal insulin has worn off, we can predict the rise we expect from the missing insulin.
If we know the basal rate that that point (BASAL U/hour) and assuming that was the correct dose to keep us level, then the hourly rise will simply be
RISE = BASAL * ISF
Our basal rate is usually not the same across the entire day, as the body’s needs change on a diurnal cycle.
But if we know that at this time of the day we should be getting BASAL units/hour, we can do the calculation. Let’s use the people from the last article:
|rise over 5 minutes
Yes just like yesterday those are real examples from real people. As you can see there’s a lot of variation! And again the ISF by itself won’t determine the rise rate (there are two different examples there that both end up at +0.2).
If your own ISF and basal rates are correct, you should be able to predict your own rise-rate for various times of day.
Watching the CGM
That “rise over 5 minutes” is particularly useful, as most CGM software will show you the rise since the last reading (and sometimes the average rise over the last few readings).
So as I know my own likely rise rate, if I see a continual rise of that rate that correction boluses are not touching, it’ll be fairly clear that my insulin isn’t working and it’s time to switch back to the previous cannula to give a correction bolus while I sort out a fresh site!
Mind you, adding food on top of this can obscure any obvious rise. For this reason it’s usually a good idea to not insert a new cannula immediately after a meal!
2 thoughts on “Detecting a failed pump site”
Thanks. Very useful info.
Two questions. Have you ever had a site go bad but not immediately? For instance on day two? I put a set in the other day. My numbers were in range the first day but I woke up to them being high. Due to the changes in physical activity at the moment I shrugged it off but my numbers would not go down. When I gave in and pulled the site it bled and it must have shifted just enough to not be good, maybe due to my workout.
Second, I’ve always been told to rotate, rotate, rotate the sites. So I usually do left side, right side, front, back, etc. The picture of the new site and the old site were fairly close together. I’m sure you do this too but do you do one location for a few then switch? So the sites are in clusters that shift? -Thanks.
It’s been very rare for a site to fail later for me. Only when I’ve accidentally pulled it.
That photo was quite old. There was a time I used a bit of a “carpet-bombing” approach to moving my sites around, but especially since I started using Fiasp I’ve had to make sure that each new site is a long way from the last. Like you I usually alternate side-to-side (the next trick is remembering where the previous one on this side was and then avoiding it).